The Unofficial Karoo User Forums
May 22, 2012, 09:55:30 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Chat Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Net Neutrality - Kingston Communication starts early  (Read 1657 times)
The Dominator
Administrator
Director
*****
Broadband Provider: Karoo - Pro 1
Posts: 528



View Profile
« on: February 14, 2008, 08:04:20 pm »

This article says it all:
pcworld.com

It seems KC has started early (I think it allows them to argue FOR bandwidth shaping..)
Logged

The Dominator....
And the following is what i want to acheive -


This is what Kcom give me:
mrX
Engineer
***
Posts: 163


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2008, 10:13:14 pm »

I think other ISP's are doing it, I read on think broadband that Tiscali sound worse than KC, apparently during their peak hours torrents and P2P become completely unusable to the point people were complaining that Tiscali had just put a complete block on it.
Logged
The Dominator
Administrator
Director
*****
Broadband Provider: Karoo - Pro 1
Posts: 528



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2008, 08:34:48 pm »

hmmmm -  it seems that the majority of ISPs have decided that they would rather they didn't become net nannys...
bbc.co.uk - news report

So where does that leave Karoo? 

To snoop on our data is bad enough but to use it as an excuse to cut the bandwidth on an already crappy overpriced service is disgusting.  In fact its so bad i am quiting Karoo and going to another ISP......

doh...!!!  (as i find myself tied over the barrel)...

(whats that i hear?  Evil laughing from the KC board? - Muwahahahahahah...)
Logged

The Dominator....
And the following is what i want to acheive -


This is what Kcom give me:
dylan
Administrator
Ofcom Inspector
*****
Broadband Provider: Karoo (Karoo Pro 1)
Posts: 1116



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 15, 2008, 08:40:20 pm »

Hmmm it is rather irritating! I think it might be an idea to do write some articles about how to get around this kind of thing. I feel a wiki coming on lol  Grin
Logged

Karoo Pro 1 Customer
The Dominator
Administrator
Director
*****
Broadband Provider: Karoo - Pro 1
Posts: 528



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 15, 2008, 08:50:23 pm »

lol....
I spit on your free and/or shareware!!!  and take your wyki with you  [in joke people!]

Seriously though I think you could be right about this..
also what are the consequences and problems associated with purchasing a server in somewhere land to use as a proxy?  We could re-sell the services (at costs) to the members of this board?

What do people think?

It could be a socks proxy (i think thats the one we want? - Fasterethernet?  Dylan? put me right?) that can not be checked via the man-in-the-middle..

We would need to know the initial take-up, the expected use of the proxy, the bandwidth through-put (per month), how to meter the bandwidth use etc...

We could also add an added benefit of filtered internet access for Parents (thinking of DansGuardian here).

responses?
Logged

The Dominator....
And the following is what i want to acheive -


This is what Kcom give me:
dylan
Administrator
Ofcom Inspector
*****
Broadband Provider: Karoo (Karoo Pro 1)
Posts: 1116



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 15, 2008, 09:08:34 pm »

It sounds a nice idea, but in principle we'd need to look into the legality of it. If you offer someone access through a proxy, then I wonder if you're responsible for what they look at? If someone were to - for instance - look at a bomb making manual, would you end up with the police knocking on the door?

I think you'd probably have to verify a persons identity to offer them the service.

Logged

Karoo Pro 1 Customer
The Dominator
Administrator
Director
*****
Broadband Provider: Karoo - Pro 1
Posts: 528



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 15, 2008, 09:16:53 pm »

yes, and ask them to sign a legal document off setting the legal responsibility to them?

Its all very good in principle but can it be implemented in practice?  There are companies out there providing this service so its a question of how do they do it?
If it did come off it would be for a select few me thinks.

I am just wondering about the problems etc that would be involved.

The legality is one issue (minor me thinks  Wink    )..  there is also Krapoo to ponder, how would they react?  Would there be enough interest?
Or would it be easier to find good quality proxies that we could recommend?
What about 'how-to' videos for setting up onion-tor etc..

hmm - complicated..

Logged

The Dominator....
And the following is what i want to acheive -


This is what Kcom give me:
dylan
Administrator
Ofcom Inspector
*****
Broadband Provider: Karoo (Karoo Pro 1)
Posts: 1116



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 15, 2008, 09:17:59 pm »

Technically I don't see how it'd be any problem at all. I'm just more concerned with the legality of it all  Wink
Logged

Karoo Pro 1 Customer
miken
Ambassador
Director
**
Broadband Provider: Karoo
Posts: 597


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: February 15, 2008, 09:31:42 pm »

Setup a dedi with some linux based torrent and usenet clients then do some kind on encrypted connection that cant be shaped and download the files, save loads of people downloading multiple times. Can vpn access network drives over different servers? used to use a vpn service and got 500KBs at peak.
Logged
dylan
Administrator
Ofcom Inspector
*****
Broadband Provider: Karoo (Karoo Pro 1)
Posts: 1116



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: February 15, 2008, 09:35:09 pm »

Fastethernet's your man to ask about VPNs, but I believe you can arrange access to any service/port over a VPN as long as you configure it correctly.
Logged

Karoo Pro 1 Customer
Fastethernet
Administrator
Engineer
*****
Broadband Provider: Karoo
Posts: 231


Don't make me angry.....


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: February 15, 2008, 09:38:01 pm »

Hmmmm, sounds like an excellent idea although I agree with Dylan the legal ramifications could be significant if serious illegal activities were perpetrated. At the very least some sort of authentication would be necessary to track who is doing what. The other issue is Krapoo could simple block access to the proxy or limit bandwidth if they wanted. Socks proxys can support simple encryption to hide what you are up to from Krapoo but they could block the IP if it gets too many hits.

An ideal solution would be some sort of seedbox with a dynamic IP address running TorrentFlux that you could VPN into and FTP the files down to your home PC.
« Last Edit: February 15, 2008, 09:43:43 pm by Fastethernet » Logged
The Dominator
Administrator
Director
*****
Broadband Provider: Karoo - Pro 1
Posts: 528



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: February 16, 2008, 12:02:19 pm »

hmmm - does this ring a bell with anyone?
theregister.co.uk

and if the USA are going down this route - can we do the same?
theregister.co.uk
Logged

The Dominator....
And the following is what i want to acheive -


This is what Kcom give me:
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!