|
Hígh Treason
|
 |
« on: May 22, 2011, 04:45:23 pm » |
|
 KCom? I wonder how this all works, presumably it's some kind of local cache for YouTube, implemented to improve speeds and balance network load. Just thought this was interesting... Wonder if there is any way to change it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Scotty
Global Moderator
Ofcom Inspector
    
Broadband Provider: Karoo
Posts: 1424
Summer Paradise
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: May 22, 2011, 05:20:54 pm » |
|
 ! I don't understand why that is happening? Does Kcom cache video's that have been watched in an external location, then when the people of Hull go to them, we download them from their cache? Explain please 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Hígh Treason
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: May 22, 2011, 06:10:02 pm » |
|
I assume the server is owned by Google (YouTube) as it is a subdomain on their network, it is possible, however, that it is located with the servers that KCom use for other purposes.
In short, yes, it appears the server is located nearby and it's purpose is to cache videos so that they load faster with less traffic on the wider network (Outside of the Hull Area it will probably use another server), this is, presumably, why popular videos load much faster than those which are less popular, as they are likely cached here already.
It isn't a new thing for a site to do this, but the last time I payed any attention it was loading from a generic address, v1.lscache.c.youtube.com, as opposed to the new one, o-o.preferred.kcom-huy1.v1.lscache2.c.youtube.com. I have no idea how long it has been in place.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
commandergc
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: May 22, 2011, 06:36:10 pm » |
|
HT is correct. Youtube has setup a lot of peering arrangements with ISPs lately, most likely to avoid the traffic management that a lot of ISPs are using.
KC is very likely to be the one hosting the cache server, how its kept update i have no clue. maybe some kind of syncing or just saving videos as they are streamed for the first time.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 22, 2011, 06:39:42 pm by commandergc »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
richardmyers
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: May 22, 2011, 08:57:11 pm » |
|
KC said about doing something like this a year or two ago, finally it's happened it would seem.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Richard Myers - If the revolution doesn't want me then I don't give a sh*t NextGenUs Customer:  
|
|
|
Scotty
Global Moderator
Ofcom Inspector
    
Broadband Provider: Karoo
Posts: 1424
Summer Paradise
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2011, 12:56:15 am » |
|
Cool! I think this can only be a good thing, to improve video loading speeds. Although saying that, the video still has to be downloaded, so how fast it is will still depend on your DL speed. Either way, well spotted.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
gusgormen
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: May 23, 2011, 12:32:53 pm » |
|
It would be interesting to find out the size (TBs) of the unit that they are using, how long it stores the cache for. ie If i watch a youtube clip at 10am, and it caches it for everyone else, how long would that item stay in cache, hours or days?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Hígh Treason
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: May 23, 2011, 12:57:05 pm » |
|
My guess would be hours, seeing as the rule in business seems to be "Always appeal to the lowest common denominator!" it would only store videos for a short time to save on space (therefore money as well), if the video is watched again, the timer would be reset, so, it is presumably full of Lady Gaga videos and Hollyoaks or whatever the current fads are, I'd put money on there being no good stuff cached on there (Like The Zombies and Murun Buchtstansangur) because nobody watches it often enough for the counter to be reset.
If YouTube didn't have a cap on the speed you could stream videos from it, this cache would make it all very fast indeed, given that the cache is probably on a higher tier than we are, or at least has more bandwidth available to it, for example, it could probably download an hour of HD video in seconds, leaving the whole thing cached so that we could get it faster, of course, it may not download something of that size in one go - time, bandwidth and disk space = money, after all.
All speculation of course, I could be entirely wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mardoxx
Receptionist

Posts: 28
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: May 23, 2011, 10:40:02 pm » |
|
% This is the RIPE Database query service. % The objects are in RPSL format. % % The RIPE Database is subject to Terms and Conditions. % See http://www.ripe.net/db/support/db-terms-conditions.pdf
% Information related to '83.100.221.224 - 83.100.221.255'
inetnum: 83.100.221.224 - 83.100.221.255 netname: KAROOGOOGLECACHE-KCOM country: GB descr: Karoo Google Cache(Clancy #75) admin-c: KR2955-RIPE tech-c: KR2955-RIPE status: ASSIGNED PA notify: [Email Removed] mnt-by: KINGSTON-MNT remarks: Please send abuse complaints to [Email Removed] changed: [Email Removed] 20101110 source: RIPE
role: KINGSTON ROLE address: Kingston Communications address: Telephone House address: Carr Lane address: Kingston-upon-Hull address: HU1 3RE phone: +44 800 138 4858 fax-no: +44 113 384 2468 remarks: ********************************************** remarks: *** Do NOT send abuse reports to any other *** remarks: *** address EXCEPT [Email Removed] *** remarks: ********************************************** e-mail: [Email Removed] remarks: trouble: Send ABUSE REPORTS to [Email Removed] admin-c: CC5271-RIPE admin-c: TS3548-RIPE tech-c: CC5271-RIPE tech-c: HS3922-RIPE tech-c: JB13035-RIPE tech-c: AF924-RIPE tech-c: RS9554-RIPE tech-c: SG6837-RIPE nic-hdl: KR2955-RIPE notify: [Email Removed] mnt-by: KINGSTON-MNT changed: [Email Removed] 20091111 source: RIPE abuse-mailbox: [Email Removed]
% Information related to '83.100.128.0/17AS12390'
route: 83.100.128.0/17 descr: KINGSTON-NET004 origin: AS12390 mnt-by: KINGSTON-MNT changed: [Email Removed] 20040220 source: RIPE http://83.100.221.240/5 hop google, not bad eh?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
David
Manager
   
Broadband Provider: Carrier Pigeon
Posts: 333
I came, I pwned, I teabagged.
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: June 02, 2011, 05:33:15 pm » |
|
Anyone else noticed heavy throttling of youtube traffic now? ever since this kcom cache went up it seems.. and the cache sucks btw, im not into lady gaga or justin bieber so go figure kcom 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|