who's nextgenus backhaul oppps its k.com an hull company and i think there not doing very well at the min and i see more complaints from them then anything else
Point being though If KC had an issue and it caused NGU problems people would complain about it in the NGU area. The point here is from a customer point of view it doesn't matter who provides the backhaul, and whether they're having problems or not, regardless the customer is going to see it as "my connection is down, sort it out". Customers don't care if it's ISP or ISP-Backhaul that is at fault, they just want their connection back up and running.
The backhaul provider is pretty much God to the ISP, without them the ISP has no connectivity. So yes, if KC had a problem and it took my NGU connection down I would complain in the NGU area; NGU are my ISP, not KC.
The fact that Talk Talk are the most complained about ISP (nothing new there) doesn't in ANY way reflect on the service Joe provides at SBB, as we all know SBB are doing a sterling job. But without Talk Talk SBB have no connectivity to the net (unless you've gone uber resilient Joe?) so anything to do with Talk Talk is related to and concerns SBB. Looking at it another way, if Talk Talk (or in NGU's case KCom) had financial difficulties reported in the media we would all discuss it in the ISP (SBB or NGU) area of the forum as it is of the highest importance and concern to customers of the ISP, yes? Tid-Bits of into are also of the same importance IMO, good or bad.
EDIT -
On the other hand here I'm sure if Talk Talk had been named the least complained about ISP there wouldn't be such a stink about this topic being in the SBB area of the forum... Good and bad, it all deserves airing, Talk Talk pertains to SBB and KC pertains to NGU - simples.