The Unofficial Karoo User Forums
May 24, 2012, 10:45:52 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Chat Help Search Calendar Login Register  
The Unofficial Karoo User Forums > Karoo User Discussion > News > Is KC trying to hide its problems
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
  Print  
Author Topic: Is KC trying to hide its problems  (Read 1640 times)
The Dominator
Administrator
Director
*****
Broadband Provider: Karoo - Pro 1
Posts: 528



View Profile
« on: October 02, 2007, 10:23:27 pm »
Have a look at the editing that has gone on at wikipedia on the Karoo ISP page
 Wink

Heres the page:
Karoo ISP on Wikipedia

Now look at the history...
history of the above page...

Check out some of the revisions..

Cheesy

Its one way of getting rid of dodgy comments..
Logged
The Dominator....
And the following is what i want to acheive -


This is what Kcom give me:
dylan
Administrator
Ofcom Inspector
*****
Broadband Provider: Karoo (Karoo Pro 1)
Posts: 1116



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 02, 2007, 10:35:25 pm »
LMAO - Dodgy as hell!

At least they can't edit Karooforums.net
Logged
Karoo Pro 1 Customer
stormy
Director
*****
Broadband Provider: Karoo (ADSL Max 8Mbps)
Posts: 757


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 03, 2007, 08:38:10 am »
Which bit is dodgy, most of the edits seem to be listed as (KC propoganda) as in someone is removing it?

To be honest, the wiki is a bit biased against KC as noted by the neutrallity statement, it could do to be completely rewritten with citations as lots of it is just speculation and no actual substance.

Mike
Logged
Malfius
Receptionist
*
Posts: 24


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 07, 2007, 11:10:21 am »
Well i dont think that they are being compltely honest about the problems with the service at the moment
Logged
Adrian
Director
*****
Broadband Provider: KC
Posts: 823


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: October 08, 2007, 04:44:38 pm »
Quote from: stormy on October 03, 2007, 08:38:10 am
Which bit is dodgy, most of the edits seem to be listed as (KC propoganda) as in someone is removing it?

To be honest, the wiki is a bit biased against KC as noted by the neutrallity statement, it could do to be completely rewritten with citations as lots of it is just speculation and no actual substance.

Mike

I agree, that it should be kept to the facts without any speculation. Although it was no surprise to see that some of the edits were actually from within KC Smiley
Logged
KC Silver Plus
Pages: [1]
  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!